Home › Models › Thermal binoculars › Compare

Pulsar Merger LRF XP35 vs Pulsar Merger LRF XP50

Two thermal binoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

The wide-angle Merger: 640×480 with a 35 mm lens for a 17.8° field of view, 1,000 m rangefinder, 9-hour dual battery, 830 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Pulsar's 640×480 thermal binocular with a 50 mm lens, 1,000 m laser rangefinder, dual battery system and 1024×768 displays.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

Pulsar Merger LRF XP35Pulsar Merger LRF XP50
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×480640×480
Pixel pitch17 µm17 µm
NETD≤25 mK≤25 mK
Lens35 mm50 mm
Magnification2–16x2.5–20x
Detection range1,350 m1,800 m
Field of view17.8°12.4°
DisplayAMOLED 1024x768AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 9 hup to 8.5 h
Batterybuilt-in 4000 mAh + APS 3 removable 3200 mAh Li-ionbuilt-in 4000 mAh + APS 3 removable 3200 mAh Li-ion
Weight830 g950 g
Water resistanceIPX7IPX7
Digital zoom—up to 8x

Sources: Pulsar Merger LRF XP35 (spec page); Pulsar Merger LRF XP50 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: Pulsar Merger LRF XP35 · Pulsar Merger LRF XP50 · all thermal binoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More