Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs Pulsar Axion 2 XQ35 Pro

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

Pulsar's compact 384×288 thermal monocular with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, an 11-hour swappable APS 5 battery and an IPX7 body; a long-running UK favourite.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 ProPulsar Axion 2 XQ35 Pro
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch17 µm17 µm
NETD≤25 mK≤25 mK
Lens35 mm35 mm
Magnification2–8x2–8x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range1,300 m1,300 m
Field of view10.7°10.7°
DisplayAMOLED 640x400AMOLED 640x400
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 11 hup to 11 h
BatteryAPS 5 removable Li-ion 4900 mAhAPS 5 removable Li-ion 4900 mAh
Weight470 g380 g
Water resistanceIPX7IPX7

Sources: Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro (spec page); Pulsar Axion 2 XQ35 Pro (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro · Pulsar Axion 2 XQ35 Pro · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More