Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35 vs HIKMICRO Gryphon GQ50L

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

HIKMICRO's current 35 mm Falcon: 640×512 at 15 mK, shutterless, 1920×1080 OLED display, 64 GB memory and a removable 21700 cell.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The 50 mm Gryphon: 640×512 thermal at 2.9x with an 8.8° field of view and 2,600 m stated detection, plus the 1080p optical channel and 600 m rangefinder.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35HIKMICRO Gryphon GQ50L
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×512640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤15 mK≤35 mK
Lens35 mm50 mm
Magnification1.9–15.2x2.9x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 8x
Detection range1,800 m2,600 m
Field of view12.5°8.8°
DisplayOLED 1920x1080OLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 6.5 hup to 4.5 h
Batteryremovable 21700 Li-ionremovable 18650 Li-ion
Weight485 g548 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67

Sources: HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35 (spec page); HIKMICRO Gryphon GQ50L (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35 · HIKMICRO Gryphon GQ50L · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More