Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

HIKMICRO Condor CQ50L vs HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

The 50 mm Condor: 640×512 at 20 mK, 3x base magnification, 8.7° field of view, 2,600 m stated detection and a 1,000 m rangefinder.
no live Amazon listing tracked
HIKMICRO's current 35 mm Falcon: 640×512 at 15 mK, shutterless, 1920×1080 OLED display, 64 GB memory and a removable 21700 cell.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

HIKMICRO Condor CQ50LHIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×512640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤20 mK≤15 mK
Lens50 mm35 mm
Magnification3–24x1.9–15.2x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 8x
Detection range2,600 m1,800 m
Field of view8.7°12.5°
DisplayOLED 1024x768OLED 1920x1080
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Battery lifeup to 6 hup to 6.5 h
Batteryreplaceable rechargeable Li-ionremovable 21700 Li-ion
Weight450 g485 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: HIKMICRO Condor CQ50L (spec page); HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: HIKMICRO Condor CQ50L · HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More