Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Taipan TM25-384 vs Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

AGM's first-generation 384×288 pocket thermal with a 25 mm lens, 50 Hz, 7.5-hour battery and IP67 body; discontinued in favour of the Taipan V2.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Zeiss's second-generation 384×288 thermal monocular with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, 11° field of view, 1024×768 AMOLED display and 8-hour built-in battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Taipan TM25-384Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm17 µm
NETD≤35 mK≤35 mK
Lens25 mm35 mm
Magnification2.5–20x2.4–9.6x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range1,180 m1,300 m
Field of view10.5°11°
DisplayLCOS 1280x960AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7.5 hup to 8 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionbuilt-in Li-ion
Weight313 g420 g
Water resistanceIP67—

Sources: AGM Taipan TM25-384 (spec page); Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Taipan TM25-384 · Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More