Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Taipan TM25-384 vs ThermTec Wild 650L

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

AGM's first-generation 384×288 pocket thermal with a 25 mm lens, 50 Hz, 7.5-hour battery and IP67 body; discontinued in favour of the Taipan V2.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The 640×512 Wild with a 50 mm lens and a 1,000 m laser rangefinder: 18 mK, 8.8° field of view, 2,600 m stated detection, GPS and 64 GB memory.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Taipan TM25-384ThermTec Wild 650L
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK≤18 mK
Lens25 mm50 mm
Magnification2.5–20x2.8–11.2x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range1,180 m2,600 m
Field of view10.5°8.8°
DisplayLCOS 1280x960AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7.5 hup to 8 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionremovable 18650 Li-ion
Weight313 g540 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67

Sources: AGM Taipan TM25-384 (spec page); ThermTec Wild 650L (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Taipan TM25-384 · ThermTec Wild 650L · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More