Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Taipan TM25-384 vs Leica Calonox View

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

AGM's first-generation 384×288 pocket thermal with a 25 mm lens, 50 Hz, 7.5-hour battery and IP67 body; discontinued in favour of the Taipan V2.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Leica's first-generation handheld thermal (2020): 640×512 at 12 µm, 42 mm lens, 1280×960 LCOS display, 16 GB, about 4–5 hours per charge.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Taipan TM25-384Leica Calonox View
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK—
Lens25 mm42 mm
Magnification2.5–20x2.5–10x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range1,180 m1,000 m
Field of view10.5°10.5°
DisplayLCOS 1280x960LCOS 1280x960
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7.5 hup to 4 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionbuilt-in Li-ion
Weight313 g685 g
Water resistanceIP67IPX4

Sources: AGM Taipan TM25-384 (spec page); Leica Calonox View (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Taipan TM25-384 · Leica Calonox View · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More