Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Taipan TM25-384 vs InfiRay Zoom ZH38

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

AGM's first-generation 384×288 pocket thermal with a 25 mm lens, 50 Hz, 7.5-hour battery and IP67 body; discontinued in favour of the Taipan V2.
no live Amazon listing tracked
A 640×512 thermal monocular with a dual field-of-view 19/38 mm lens, so one unit covers both close woodland and open ground.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Taipan TM25-384InfiRay Zoom ZH38
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK≤25 mK
Lens25 mm38 mm
Magnification2.5–20x1.6–12.8x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range1,180 m1,974 m
Field of view10.5°—
DisplayLCOS 1280x960OLED 1440x1080
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7.5 hup to 10 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionremovable Li-ion 4400 mAh (two supplied)
Weight313 g580 g
Water resistanceIP67—

Sources: AGM Taipan TM25-384 (spec page); InfiRay Zoom ZH38 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Taipan TM25-384 · InfiRay Zoom ZH38 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More