Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Taipan TM25-384 vs InfiRay Finder FH35R V2

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

AGM's first-generation 384×288 pocket thermal with a 25 mm lens, 50 Hz, 7.5-hour battery and IP67 body; discontinued in favour of the Taipan V2.
no live Amazon listing tracked
InfiRay's compact 640×512 thermal monocular with a 35 mm F0.9 lens, 800 m laser rangefinder and swappable battery packs.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Taipan TM25-384InfiRay Finder FH35R V2
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK≤20 mK
Lens25 mm35 mm
Magnification2.5–20x2–8x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range1,180 m1,800 m
Field of view10.5°10.5°
DisplayLCOS 1280x960AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7.5 hup to 5.5 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionremovable Li-ion pack (two supplied)
Weight313 g400 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67

Sources: AGM Taipan TM25-384 (spec page); InfiRay Finder FH35R V2 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Taipan TM25-384 · InfiRay Finder FH35R V2 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More