Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Taipan TM25-384 vs Guide TJ650 LRF

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

AGM's first-generation 384×288 pocket thermal with a 25 mm lens, 50 Hz, 7.5-hour battery and IP67 body; discontinued in favour of the Taipan V2.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Guide's long-range 640×512 monocular: 50 mm F1.0 lens, 20 mK, 1920×1080 AMOLED display, 1,000 m rangefinder and two swappable 18650 cells.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Taipan TM25-384Guide TJ650 LRF
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK≤20 mK
Lens25 mm50 mm
Magnification2.5–20x3.8–30.3x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 8x
Detection range1,180 m2,000 m
Field of view10.5°8.8°
DisplayLCOS 1280x960AMOLED 1920x1080
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7.5 hup to 10 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ion2x removable 18650 Li-ion
Weight313 g625 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67

Sources: AGM Taipan TM25-384 (spec page); Guide TJ650 LRF (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Taipan TM25-384 · Guide TJ650 LRF · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More