Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM StingIR-384 vs ThermTec Wild 650L

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The 640×512 Wild with a 50 mm lens and a 1,000 m laser rangefinder: 18 mK, 8.8° field of view, 2,600 m stated detection, GPS and 64 GB memory.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM StingIR-384ThermTec Wild 650L
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens16 mm50 mm
Magnification1–4x2.8–11.2x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range730 m2,600 m
Field of view16.3°8.8°
DisplayOLED 1024x768AMOLED 1024x768
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 8 h
Batteryremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650removable 18650 Li-ion
Weight200 g540 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67
NETD—≤18 mK
Recording—photo and video
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); ThermTec Wild 650L (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · ThermTec Wild 650L · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More