A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare
AGM StingIR-384 vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro
Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.
The Axion 2 XQ35 Pro with a 1,000 m laser rangefinder added: same 384×288 sensor, 35 mm lens and 11-hour APS 5 battery, 90 g heavier.
£1,929.00cheapest tracked listing
Specification side by side
| AGM StingIR-384 | Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | Thermal | Thermal |
| Sensor | 384×288 | 384×288 |
| Pixel pitch | 12 µm | 17 µm |
| Lens | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Magnification | 1–4x | 2–8x |
| Digital zoom | up to 4x | up to 4x |
| Detection range | 730 m | 1,300 m |
| Field of view | 16.3° | 10.7° |
| Display | OLED 1024x768 | AMOLED 640x400 |
| Battery life | up to 5 h | up to 11 h |
| Battery | removable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650 | APS 5 removable Li-ion 4900 mAh |
| Weight | 200 g | 470 g |
| Water resistance | IP67 | IPX7 |
| NETD | — | ≤25 mK |
| Recording | — | photo and video |
| Wi-Fi / app | — | yes |
Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.
Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro · all thermal monoculars in stock today
Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More