Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM StingIR-384 vs Nightfox Arctic

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Nightfox's head-mountable 1x thermal monocular: 256×192 at 30 mK, a 7 mm fixed-focus lens with a 24° field of view, 50 Hz, video recording, 9-hour 18650 cell.
£349.99cheapest tracked listing
Check price on Amazon →

Specification side by side

AGM StingIR-384Nightfox Arctic
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288256×192
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens16 mm7 mm
Magnification1–4x1–4x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range730 m180 m
Field of view16.3°23.8°
DisplayOLED 1024x768AMOLED 410x502
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 9 h
Batteryremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650removable 18650 Li-ion 3500 mAh
Weight200 g280 g
Water resistanceIP67IP65
NETD—≤30 mK
Recognition range—100 m
Recording—photo and video
Launch RRP—£349.99

Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); Nightfox Arctic (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · Nightfox Arctic · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More