Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM StingIR-384 vs Leica Calonox 2 View

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Leica's current 640×480 thermal monocular: 42 mm F1.1 lens, 60 Hz, full-HD OLED display, 32 GB memory, IP67 and a nitrogen-filled body.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM StingIR-384Leica Calonox 2 View
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×480
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens16 mm42 mm
Magnification1–4x2.5–20x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 8x
Detection range730 m770 m
Field of view16.3°10.3°
DisplayOLED 1024x768OLED 1920x1080
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 8 h
Batteryremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650built-in Li-ion (2x 2420 mAh)
Weight200 g657 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67
NETD—≤40 mK
Recording—photo and video
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); Leica Calonox 2 View (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · Leica Calonox 2 View · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More