Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM StingIR-384 vs InfiRay Zoom ZH38

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
A 640×512 thermal monocular with a dual field-of-view 19/38 mm lens, so one unit covers both close woodland and open ground.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM StingIR-384InfiRay Zoom ZH38
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens16 mm38 mm
Magnification1–4x1.6–12.8x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range730 m1,974 m
Field of view16.3°—
DisplayOLED 1024x768OLED 1440x1080
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 10 h
Batteryremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650removable Li-ion 4400 mAh (two supplied)
Weight200 g580 g
Water resistanceIP67—
NETD—≤25 mK
Recording—photo and video
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); InfiRay Zoom ZH38 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · InfiRay Zoom ZH38 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More