Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM StingIR-384 vs Guide TJ650 LRF

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Guide's long-range 640×512 monocular: 50 mm F1.0 lens, 20 mK, 1920×1080 AMOLED display, 1,000 m rangefinder and two swappable 18650 cells.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM StingIR-384Guide TJ650 LRF
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens16 mm50 mm
Magnification1–4x3.8–30.3x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 8x
Detection range730 m2,000 m
Field of view16.3°8.8°
DisplayOLED 1024x768AMOLED 1920x1080
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 10 h
Batteryremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 186502x removable 18650 Li-ion
Weight200 g625 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67
NETD—≤20 mK
Recording—photo and video
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); Guide TJ650 LRF (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · Guide TJ650 LRF · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More