Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM StingIR-384 vs AGM Taipan TM25-384

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked
AGM's first-generation 384×288 pocket thermal with a 25 mm lens, 50 Hz, 7.5-hour battery and IP67 body; discontinued in favour of the Taipan V2.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM StingIR-384AGM Taipan TM25-384
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
Lens16 mm25 mm
Magnification1–4x2.5–20x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 8x
Detection range730 m1,180 m
Field of view16.3°10.5°
DisplayOLED 1024x768LCOS 1280x960
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 7.5 h
Batteryremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650built-in Li-ion
Weight200 g313 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67
NETD—≤35 mK
Recording—photo and video
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: AGM StingIR-384 (spec page); AGM Taipan TM25-384 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM StingIR-384 · AGM Taipan TM25-384 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More