Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Asp-Micro TM160 vs Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A pocket-sized 160×120 thermal for gardens and short range: 25° field of view, 10-hour battery, recording, Wi-Fi, IP67.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Zeiss's second-generation 384×288 thermal monocular with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, 11° field of view, 1024×768 AMOLED display and 8-hour built-in battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Asp-Micro TM160Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor160×120384×288
NETD≤35 mK≤35 mK
Lens6.2 mm35 mm
Magnification0.5–2x2.4–9.6x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range250 m1,300 m
Field of view24.7°11°
DisplayLCOS 720x540AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 10 hup to 8 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionbuilt-in Li-ion
Weight250 g420 g
Water resistanceIP67—
Pixel pitch—17 µm

Sources: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 (spec page); Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 · Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More