Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Asp-Micro TM160 vs Pulsar Axion XM30F

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A pocket-sized 160×120 thermal for gardens and short range: 25° field of view, 10-hour battery, recording, Wi-Fi, IP67.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Pulsar's entry-level 320×240 thermal monocular: 30 mm F1.2 lens, 3x base magnification, APS 3 swappable battery, IPX7, 310 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Asp-Micro TM160Pulsar Axion XM30F
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor160×120320×240
NETD≤35 mK≤50 mK
Lens6.2 mm30 mm
Magnification0.5–2x3–12x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range250 m1,300 m
Field of view24.7°7.8°
DisplayLCOS 720x540AMOLED 640x400
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 10 hup to 7 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionAPS 3 removable Li-ion 3200 mAh
Weight250 g310 g
Water resistanceIP67IPX7
Pixel pitch—12 µm

Sources: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 (spec page); Pulsar Axion XM30F (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 · Pulsar Axion XM30F · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More