Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Asp-Micro TM160 vs Pulsar Axion 2 XQ35 Pro

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A pocket-sized 160×120 thermal for gardens and short range: 25° field of view, 10-hour battery, recording, Wi-Fi, IP67.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Pulsar's compact 384×288 thermal monocular with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, an 11-hour swappable APS 5 battery and an IPX7 body; a long-running UK favourite.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Asp-Micro TM160Pulsar Axion 2 XQ35 Pro
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor160×120384×288
NETD≤35 mK≤25 mK
Lens6.2 mm35 mm
Magnification0.5–2x2–8x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range250 m1,300 m
Field of view24.7°10.7°
DisplayLCOS 720x540AMOLED 640x400
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 10 hup to 11 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionAPS 5 removable Li-ion 4900 mAh
Weight250 g380 g
Water resistanceIP67IPX7
Pixel pitch—17 µm

Sources: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 (spec page); Pulsar Axion 2 XQ35 Pro (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 · Pulsar Axion 2 XQ35 Pro · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More