Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Asp-Micro TM160 vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XG35

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A pocket-sized 160×120 thermal for gardens and short range: 25° field of view, 10-hour battery, recording, Wi-Fi, IP67.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The 640×480 Axion 2 with a built-in 1,000 m laser rangefinder, 35 mm lens, 12.5° field of view and 1024×768 display.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Asp-Micro TM160Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XG35
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor160×120640×480
NETD≤35 mK≤40 mK
Lens6.2 mm35 mm
Magnification0.5–2x2.5–20x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 8x
Detection range250 m1,750 m
Field of view24.7°12.5°
DisplayLCOS 720x540AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 10 hup to 7 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionAPS 5 removable Li-ion 4900 mAh
Weight250 g470 g
Water resistanceIP67IPX7
Pixel pitch—12 µm

Sources: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 (spec page); Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XG35 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 · Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XG35 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More