Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Asp-Micro TM160 vs AGM StingIR-384

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A pocket-sized 160×120 thermal for gardens and short range: 25° field of view, 10-hour battery, recording, Wi-Fi, IP67.
no live Amazon listing tracked
A 200 g head- or hand-held 384×288 thermal with a 16 mm lens and 1x base magnification, running on CR123A or 18650 cells. Discontinued.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Asp-Micro TM160AGM StingIR-384
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor160×120384×288
NETD≤35 mK—
Lens6.2 mm16 mm
Magnification0.5–2x1–4x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range250 m730 m
Field of view24.7°16.3°
DisplayLCOS 720x540OLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and video—
Wi-Fi / appyes—
Battery lifeup to 10 hup to 5 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionremovable CR123A / RCR123 / 18650
Weight250 g200 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67
Pixel pitch—12 µm

Sources: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 (spec page); AGM StingIR-384 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Asp-Micro TM160 · AGM StingIR-384 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More