Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2 vs Zeiss DTI 4/50

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

Zeiss's second-generation 384×288 thermal monocular with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, 11° field of view, 1024×768 AMOLED display and 8-hour built-in battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Zeiss's 640×512 long-range monocular: 50 mm F1.0 lens, 25 mK, 9° field of view, about 2,635 m stated detection, 32 GB memory, IP66.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2Zeiss DTI 4/50
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Pixel pitch17 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK≤25 mK
Lens35 mm50 mm
Magnification2.4–9.6x2.9–11.6x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range1,300 m2,635 m
Field of view11°9°
DisplayAMOLED 1024x768AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 8 hup to 7 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionbuilt-in Li-ion
Weight420 g470 g
Water resistance—IP66

Sources: Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2 (spec page); Zeiss DTI 4/50 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2 · Zeiss DTI 4/50 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More