Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

Pulsar Telos XP50 vs Pulsar Telos XQ35

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

Pulsar's upgradeable full-size monocular: 640×480 at 18 mK with a 50 mm F1.0 lens, 1024×768 display, 64 GB memory and a 6,400 mAh LPS 7i battery.
£2,499.00cheapest tracked listing
Check price on Amazon →
The 384×288 Telos: 35 mm lens, 3x base magnification, 1024×768 display and the big 6,400 mAh LPS 7i battery in the upgradeable Telos body.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

Pulsar Telos XP50Pulsar Telos XQ35
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×480384×288
Pixel pitch17 µm17 µm
NETD≤18 mK≤25 mK
Lens50 mm35 mm
Magnification2.5–10x3–12x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range1,800 m1,300 m
Field of view12.4°10.7°
DisplayAMOLED 1024x768AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 8.5 hup to 8.5 h
BatteryLPS 7i removable Li-ion 6400 mAhLPS 7i removable Li-ion 6400 mAh
Weight660 g570 g
Water resistanceIPX7IPX7

Sources: Pulsar Telos XP50 (spec page); Pulsar Telos XQ35 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: Pulsar Telos XP50 · Pulsar Telos XQ35 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More