Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

Pulsar Telos LRF XP50 vs Pulsar Telos XP50

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

The Telos XP50 with a 1,000 m laser rangefinder built in; otherwise the same 640×480, 50 mm, 18 mK unit, 60 g heavier.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Pulsar's upgradeable full-size monocular: 640×480 at 18 mK with a 50 mm F1.0 lens, 1024×768 display, 64 GB memory and a 6,400 mAh LPS 7i battery.
£2,499.00cheapest tracked listing
Check price on Amazon →

Specification side by side

Pulsar Telos LRF XP50Pulsar Telos XP50
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×480640×480
Pixel pitch17 µm17 µm
NETD≤18 mK≤18 mK
Lens50 mm50 mm
Magnification2.5–10x2.5–10x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range1,800 m1,800 m
Field of view12.4°12.4°
DisplayAMOLED 1024x768AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 8.5 hup to 8.5 h
BatteryLPS 7i removable Li-ion 6400 mAhLPS 7i removable Li-ion 6400 mAh
Weight720 g660 g
Water resistanceIPX7IPX7

Sources: Pulsar Telos LRF XP50 (spec page); Pulsar Telos XP50 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: Pulsar Telos LRF XP50 · Pulsar Telos XP50 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More