Home › Models › Thermal binoculars › Compare

Pulsar Merger LRF XL50 vs Pulsar Merger LRF XP35

Two thermal binoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

The wide-angle Merger: 640×480 with a 35 mm lens for a 17.8° field of view, 1,000 m rangefinder, 9-hour dual battery, 830 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

Pulsar Merger LRF XL50Pulsar Merger LRF XP35
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor1024×768640×480
Pixel pitch12 µm17 µm
NETD≤40 mK≤25 mK
Lens50 mm35 mm
Magnification2.5–20x2–16x
Digital zoomup to 8x—
Detection range2,300 m1,350 m
Field of view14°17.8°
DisplayAMOLED 1024x768AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7 hup to 9 h
Batterybuilt-in 4000 mAh + APS 3 removable 3200 mAh Li-ionbuilt-in 4000 mAh + APS 3 removable 3200 mAh Li-ion
Weight950 g830 g
Water resistanceIPX7IPX7

Sources: Pulsar Merger LRF XL50 (spec page); Pulsar Merger LRF XP35 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: Pulsar Merger LRF XL50 · Pulsar Merger LRF XP35 · all thermal binoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More