Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

Pulsar Axion Compact XG35 vs Pulsar Telos XP50

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

A 640×480 sensor in Pulsar's smallest body: 35 mm lens, 12.5° field of view, 64 GB memory, APS 3 battery, 300 g without battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Pulsar's upgradeable full-size monocular: 640×480 at 18 mK with a 50 mm F1.0 lens, 1024×768 display, 64 GB memory and a 6,400 mAh LPS 7i battery.
£2,499.00cheapest tracked listing
Check price on Amazon →

Specification side by side

Pulsar Axion Compact XG35Pulsar Telos XP50
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×480640×480
Pixel pitch12 µm17 µm
NETD≤40 mK≤18 mK
Lens35 mm50 mm
Magnification2.5–20x2.5–10x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range1,750 m1,800 m
Field of view12.5°12.4°
DisplayAMOLED 640x400AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7 hup to 8.5 h
BatteryAPS 3 removable Li-ion 3200 mAhLPS 7i removable Li-ion 6400 mAh
Weight300 g660 g
Water resistanceIPX7IPX7

Sources: Pulsar Axion Compact XG35 (spec page); Pulsar Telos XP50 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: Pulsar Axion Compact XG35 · Pulsar Telos XP50 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More