Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro vs Pulsar Telos LRF XP50

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

The Telos XP50 with a 1,000 m laser rangefinder built in; otherwise the same 640×480, 50 mm, 18 mK unit, 60 g heavier.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 ProPulsar Telos LRF XP50
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×480
Pixel pitch17 µm17 µm
NETD≤25 mK≤18 mK
Lens35 mm50 mm
Magnification2–8x2.5–10x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range1,300 m1,800 m
Field of view10.7°12.4°
DisplayAMOLED 640x400AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 11 hup to 8.5 h
BatteryAPS 5 removable Li-ion 4900 mAhLPS 7i removable Li-ion 6400 mAh
Weight470 g720 g
Water resistanceIPX7IPX7

Sources: Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro (spec page); Pulsar Telos LRF XP50 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XQ35 Pro · Pulsar Telos LRF XP50 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More