Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35 vs HIKMICRO Lynx 3.0 LH25

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

HIKMICRO's current 35 mm Falcon: 640×512 at 15 mK, shutterless, 1920×1080 OLED display, 64 GB memory and a removable 21700 cell.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35HIKMICRO Lynx 3.0 LH25
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×512384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤15 mK≤15 mK
Lens35 mm25 mm
Magnification1.9–15.2x2.5–20x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 8x
Detection range1,800 m1,200 m
Field of view12.5°10.5°
DisplayOLED 1920x1080AMOLED 1920x1080
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 6.5 hup to 5 h
Batteryremovable 21700 Li-ionremovable 18650 Li-ion
Weight485 g328 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67

Sources: HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35 (spec page); HIKMICRO Lynx 3.0 LH25 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35 · HIKMICRO Lynx 3.0 LH25 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More