Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

HIKMICRO Condor CQ50L vs HIKMICRO Lynx Pro LE10

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

The 50 mm Condor: 640×512 at 20 mK, 3x base magnification, 8.7° field of view, 2,600 m stated detection and a 1,000 m rangefinder.
no live Amazon listing tracked
HIKMICRO's original entry thermal: a 256×192 sensor behind a 10 mm lens for an 18° field of view, 8-hour built-in battery, 260 g, IP67.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

HIKMICRO Condor CQ50LHIKMICRO Lynx Pro LE10
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×512256×192
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤20 mK≤35 mK
Lens50 mm9.7 mm
Magnification3–24x—
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range2,600 m458 m
Field of view8.7°18°
DisplayOLED 1024x768LCOS 720x540
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Battery lifeup to 6 hup to 8 h
Batteryreplaceable rechargeable Li-ionbuilt-in rechargeable Li-ion
Weight450 g260 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: HIKMICRO Condor CQ50L (spec page); HIKMICRO Lynx Pro LE10 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: HIKMICRO Condor CQ50L · HIKMICRO Lynx Pro LE10 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More