Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

HIKMICRO Condor CQ50L vs HIKMICRO Lynx 2.0 LH25

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

The 50 mm Condor: 640×512 at 20 mK, 3x base magnification, 8.7° field of view, 2,600 m stated detection and a 1,000 m rangefinder.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The 25 mm Lynx 2.0: 384×288 at 20 mK, 2.4x base magnification, 10.5° field of view and 1,200 m stated detection in a 277 g IP67 body.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

HIKMICRO Condor CQ50LHIKMICRO Lynx 2.0 LH25
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×512384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤20 mK≤20 mK
Lens50 mm25 mm
Magnification3–24x2.4–19.2x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 8x
Detection range2,600 m1,200 m
Field of view8.7°10.5°
DisplayOLED 1024x768OLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Battery lifeup to 6 hup to 6.5 h
Batteryreplaceable rechargeable Li-ionreplaceable rechargeable Li-ion
Weight450 g277 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: HIKMICRO Condor CQ50L (spec page); HIKMICRO Lynx 2.0 LH25 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: HIKMICRO Condor CQ50L · HIKMICRO Lynx 2.0 LH25 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More