Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L vs HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

HIKMICRO's 640×512 rangefinding monocular: 35 mm lens, 12.5° field of view, 1,000 m laser rangefinder and a 6-hour swappable battery at 400 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked
HIKMICRO's current 35 mm Falcon: 640×512 at 15 mK, shutterless, 1920×1080 OLED display, 64 GB memory and a removable 21700 cell.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

HIKMICRO Condor CQ35LHIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×512640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤20 mK≤15 mK
Lens35 mm35 mm
Magnification2–16x1.9–15.2x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 8x
Detection range1,800 m1,800 m
Field of view12.5°12.5°
DisplayOLED 1024x768OLED 1920x1080
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Battery lifeup to 6 hup to 6.5 h
Batteryreplaceable rechargeable Li-ionremovable 21700 Li-ion
Weight400 g485 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67
Wi-Fi / app—yes

Sources: HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L (spec page); HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: HIKMICRO Condor CQ35L · HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More