Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

HIKMICRO Condor CH25L vs Nightfox Arctic

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

The 384×288 Condor: a 25 mm lens, 10.5° field of view, 1,200 m stated detection and a 1,000 m laser rangefinder, 386 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Nightfox's head-mountable 1x thermal monocular: 256×192 at 30 mK, a 7 mm fixed-focus lens with a 24° field of view, 50 Hz, video recording, 9-hour 18650 cell.
£349.99cheapest tracked listing
Check price on Amazon →

Specification side by side

HIKMICRO Condor CH25LNightfox Arctic
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288256×192
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤20 mK≤30 mK
Lens25 mm7 mm
Magnification2.5–20x1–4x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range1,200 m180 m
Field of view10.5°23.8°
DisplayOLED 1024x768AMOLED 410x502
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyes—
Battery lifeup to 6 hup to 9 h
Batteryreplaceable rechargeable Li-ionremovable 18650 Li-ion 3500 mAh
Weight386 g280 g
Water resistanceIP67IP65
Recognition range—100 m
Launch RRP—£349.99

Sources: HIKMICRO Condor CH25L (spec page); Nightfox Arctic (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: HIKMICRO Condor CH25L · Nightfox Arctic · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More