Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

HIKMICRO Condor CH25L vs HIKMICRO Falcon FQ25

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

The 384×288 Condor: a 25 mm lens, 10.5° field of view, 1,200 m stated detection and a 1,000 m laser rangefinder, 386 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The wide-angle original Falcon: a 640×512 sensor at 20 mK behind a 25 mm lens for a 17.5° field of view, with 64 GB memory and a swappable battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

HIKMICRO Condor CH25LHIKMICRO Falcon FQ25
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤20 mK≤20 mK
Lens25 mm25 mm
Magnification2.5–20x1.4x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 8x
Detection range1,200 m1,200 m
Field of view10.5°17.5°
DisplayOLED 1024x768OLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyes—
Battery lifeup to 6 hup to 5 h
Batteryreplaceable rechargeable Li-ionreplaceable rechargeable Li-ion
Weight386 g500 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67

Sources: HIKMICRO Condor CH25L (spec page); HIKMICRO Falcon FQ25 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: HIKMICRO Condor CH25L · HIKMICRO Falcon FQ25 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More