The 384×288 Condor: a 25 mm lens, 10.5° field of view, 1,200 m stated detection and a 1,000 m laser rangefinder, 386 g.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare
HIKMICRO Condor CH25L vs HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35
Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.
HIKMICRO's current 35 mm Falcon: 640×512 at 15 mK, shutterless, 1920×1080 OLED display, 64 GB memory and a removable 21700 cell.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Specification side by side
| HIKMICRO Condor CH25L | HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | Thermal | Thermal |
| Sensor | 384×288 | 640×512 |
| Pixel pitch | 12 µm | 12 µm |
| NETD | ≤20 mK | ≤15 mK |
| Lens | 25 mm | 35 mm |
| Magnification | 2.5–20x | 1.9–15.2x |
| Digital zoom | up to 8x | up to 8x |
| Detection range | 1,200 m | 1,800 m |
| Field of view | 10.5° | 12.5° |
| Display | OLED 1024x768 | OLED 1920x1080 |
| Recording | photo and video | photo and video |
| Wi-Fi / app | yes | yes |
| Battery life | up to 6 h | up to 6.5 h |
| Battery | replaceable rechargeable Li-ion | removable 21700 Li-ion |
| Weight | 386 g | 485 g |
| Water resistance | IP67 | IP67 |
Sources: HIKMICRO Condor CH25L (spec page); HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.
Full pages: HIKMICRO Condor CH25L · HIKMICRO Falcon 2.0 FQ35 · all thermal monoculars in stock today
Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More