Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

Burris BTH 35 v2 vs Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

Burris's 400×300 handheld thermal with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, 1280×960 display, Wi-Fi app control and a tripod thread; a US product sold in small numbers in the UK.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Zeiss's second-generation 384×288 thermal monocular with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, 11° field of view, 1024×768 AMOLED display and 8-hour built-in battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

Burris BTH 35 v2Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor400×300384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm17 µm
Lens35 mm35 mm
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Field of view7.8°11°
DisplayLCOS 1280x960AMOLED 1024x768
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 5 hup to 8 h
Weight624 g420 g
NETD—≤35 mK
Magnification—2.4–9.6x
Detection range—1,300 m
Recording—photo and video
Battery—built-in Li-ion

Sources: Burris BTH 35 v2 (spec page); Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: Burris BTH 35 v2 · Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More