Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x vs Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Zeiss's second-generation 384×288 thermal monocular with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, 11° field of view, 1024×768 AMOLED display and 8-hour built-in battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5xZeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Magnification1.3–5x2.4–9.6x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range686 m1,300 m
Field of view16°11°
Display1280x720AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 18 hup to 8 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionbuilt-in Li-ion
Weight850 g420 g
Pixel pitch—17 µm
NETD—≤35 mK
Lens—35 mm

Sources: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page); Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · Zeiss DTI 3/35 Gen 2 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More