Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x vs ThermTec Wild 650L

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The 640×512 Wild with a 50 mm lens and a 1,000 m laser rangefinder: 18 mK, 8.8° field of view, 2,600 m stated detection, GPS and 64 GB memory.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5xThermTec Wild 650L
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Magnification1.3–5x2.8–11.2x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range686 m2,600 m
Field of view16°8.8°
Display1280x720AMOLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 18 hup to 8 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionremovable 18650 Li-ion
Weight850 g540 g
Pixel pitch—12 µm
NETD—≤18 mK
Lens—50 mm
Water resistance—IP67

Sources: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page); ThermTec Wild 650L (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · ThermTec Wild 650L · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More