Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x vs Nightfox Arctic

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Nightfox's head-mountable 1x thermal monocular: 256×192 at 30 mK, a 7 mm fixed-focus lens with a 24° field of view, 50 Hz, video recording, 9-hour 18650 cell.
£349.99cheapest tracked listing
Check price on Amazon →

Specification side by side

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5xNightfox Arctic
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288256×192
Magnification1.3–5x1–4x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range686 m180 m
Field of view16°23.8°
Display1280x720AMOLED 410x502
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyes—
Battery lifeup to 18 hup to 9 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionremovable 18650 Li-ion 3500 mAh
Weight850 g280 g
Pixel pitch—12 µm
NETD—≤30 mK
Lens—7 mm
Recognition range—100 m
Water resistance—IP65
Launch RRP—£349.99

Sources: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page); Nightfox Arctic (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · Nightfox Arctic · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More