Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x vs Leica Calonox View

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Leica's first-generation handheld thermal (2020): 640×512 at 12 µm, 42 mm lens, 1280×960 LCOS display, 16 GB, about 4–5 hours per charge.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5xLeica Calonox View
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Magnification1.3–5x2.5–10x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range686 m1,000 m
Field of view16°10.5°
Display1280x720LCOS 1280x960
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 18 hup to 4 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionbuilt-in Li-ion
Weight850 g685 g
Pixel pitch—12 µm
Lens—42 mm
Water resistance—IPX4

Sources: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page); Leica Calonox View (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · Leica Calonox View · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More