Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x vs InfiRay Zoom ZH38

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
A 640×512 thermal monocular with a dual field-of-view 19/38 mm lens, so one unit covers both close woodland and open ground.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5xInfiRay Zoom ZH38
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Magnification1.3–5x1.6–12.8x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 4x
Detection range686 m1,974 m
Field of view16°—
Display1280x720OLED 1440x1080
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 18 hup to 10 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionremovable Li-ion 4400 mAh (two supplied)
Weight850 g580 g
Pixel pitch—12 µm
NETD—≤25 mK
Lens—38 mm

Sources: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page); InfiRay Zoom ZH38 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · InfiRay Zoom ZH38 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More