Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x vs Guide TJ650 LRF

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Guide's long-range 640×512 monocular: 50 mm F1.0 lens, 20 mK, 1920×1080 AMOLED display, 1,000 m rangefinder and two swappable 18650 cells.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5xGuide TJ650 LRF
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Magnification1.3–5x3.8–30.3x
Digital zoomup to 4xup to 8x
Detection range686 m2,000 m
Field of view16°8.8°
Display1280x720AMOLED 1920x1080
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 18 hup to 10 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ion2x removable 18650 Li-ion
Weight850 g625 g
Pixel pitch—12 µm
NETD—≤20 mK
Lens—50 mm
Water resistance—IP67

Sources: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page); Guide TJ650 LRF (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · Guide TJ650 LRF · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More