Home › Models › Thermal binoculars › Compare

ATN BinoX 4T 640 2.5-25x vs Pulsar Merger Duo NXP50

Two thermal binoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

ATN's 640×480 thermal binocular with a 1,000 m laser rangefinder, 60 Hz sensor, video recording and a 16-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Pulsar's multispectral binocular: a 640×480 thermal channel with a 50 mm lens and a 1920×1200 digital night vision channel, switchable or blended; no rangefinder.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

ATN BinoX 4T 640 2.5-25xPulsar Merger Duo NXP50
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor640×480640×480
NETD≤25 mK≤25 mK
Magnification2.5–25x3–24x
Digital zoomup to 10x—
Field of view12.5°12.4°
Display2x 1280x720AMOLED 1280x960
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 16 hup to 7.5 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ion (USB-C)built-in 4000 mAh + APS 3 removable 3200 mAh Li-ion
Weight1,120 g1,200 g
Pixel pitch—17 µm
Lens—50 mm
Detection range—1,800 m
Water resistance—IPX7

Sources: ATN BinoX 4T 640 2.5-25x (spec page); Pulsar Merger Duo NXP50 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: ATN BinoX 4T 640 2.5-25x · Pulsar Merger Duo NXP50 · all thermal binoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More