Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Taipan TM25-384 vs ThermTec Cyclops 335 Pro

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

AGM's first-generation 384×288 pocket thermal with a 25 mm lens, 50 Hz, 7.5-hour battery and IP67 body; discontinued in favour of the Taipan V2.
no live Amazon listing tracked
ThermTec's 384×288 Cyclops with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, 25 mK, 3.3x base magnification, 12-hour built-in battery and IP67 rating.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Taipan TM25-384ThermTec Cyclops 335 Pro
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK≤25 mK
Lens25 mm35 mm
Magnification2.5–20x3.3–19.8x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 6x
Detection range1,180 m1,750 m
Field of view10.5°7.5°
DisplayLCOS 1280x960OLED 1024x768
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7.5 hup to 12 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionbuilt-in 2x 18650 Li-ion
Weight313 g550 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67

Sources: AGM Taipan TM25-384 (spec page); ThermTec Cyclops 335 Pro (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Taipan TM25-384 · ThermTec Cyclops 335 Pro · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More