Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Taipan TM25-384 vs Nocpix Vista H35R

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

AGM's first-generation 384×288 pocket thermal with a 25 mm lens, 50 Hz, 7.5-hour battery and IP67 body; discontinued in favour of the Taipan V2.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The 35 mm Vista: 640×512 at 15 mK, 12.5° field of view, 60 Hz, 2560×2560 display, 1,200 m rangefinder and two swappable packs.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Taipan TM25-384Nocpix Vista H35R
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288640×512
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK≤15 mK
Lens25 mm35 mm
Magnification2.5–20x3–28x
Digital zoomup to 8x—
Detection range1,180 m1,800 m
Field of view10.5°12.5°
DisplayLCOS 1280x960AMOLED 2560x2560
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7.5 hup to 11 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionremovable Li-ion pack IBP-7 4400 mAh (two supplied)
Weight313 g640 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67K

Sources: AGM Taipan TM25-384 (spec page); Nocpix Vista H35R (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Taipan TM25-384 · Nocpix Vista H35R · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More