Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Taipan TM25-384 vs Lahoux Spotter 35

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

AGM's first-generation 384×288 pocket thermal with a 25 mm lens, 50 Hz, 7.5-hour battery and IP67 body; discontinued in favour of the Taipan V2.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Dutch brand Lahoux's 384×288 Spotter with a 35 mm lens, 1280×960 display, video output and Wi-Fi; a 4–7 hour built-in battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Taipan TM25-384Lahoux Spotter 35
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK≤50 mK
Lens25 mm35 mm
Magnification2.5–20x—
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range1,180 m1,361 m
Field of view10.5°—
DisplayLCOS 1280x9601280x960
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7.5 hup to 4 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionbuilt-in Li-ion
Weight313 g—
Water resistanceIP67IP66

Sources: AGM Taipan TM25-384 (spec page); Lahoux Spotter 35 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Taipan TM25-384 · Lahoux Spotter 35 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More