Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Taipan TM25-384 vs InfiRay Eye III EL25

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

AGM's first-generation 384×288 pocket thermal with a 25 mm lens, 50 Hz, 7.5-hour battery and IP67 body; discontinued in favour of the Taipan V2.
no live Amazon listing tracked
The 25 mm model in InfiRay's current Eye III line: 384×288 at 12 µm, 25 mK, 1440×1080 AMOLED display, 8 hours, IP67.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Taipan TM25-384InfiRay Eye III EL25
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK≤25 mK
Lens25 mm25 mm
Magnification2.5–20x—
Digital zoomup to 8x—
Detection range1,180 m—
Field of view10.5°—
DisplayLCOS 1280x960AMOLED 1440x1080
Recordingphoto and video—
Wi-Fi / appyes—
Battery lifeup to 7.5 hup to 8 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ion—
Weight313 g480 g
Water resistanceIP67IP67

Sources: AGM Taipan TM25-384 (spec page); InfiRay Eye III EL25 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Taipan TM25-384 · InfiRay Eye III EL25 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More