Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Taipan TM25-384 vs Guide TD210

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

AGM's first-generation 384×288 pocket thermal with a 25 mm lens, 50 Hz, 7.5-hour battery and IP67 body; discontinued in favour of the Taipan V2.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Guide's entry 256×192 thermal with a 10 mm lens and 17.5° field of view, an 8-hour swappable cell and a 200 m laser pointer; 25 Hz.
£549.00cheapest tracked listing
Check price on Amazon →

Specification side by side

AGM Taipan TM25-384Guide TD210
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288256×192
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK≤50 mK
Lens25 mm10 mm
Magnification2.5–20x1.8–3.6x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 2x
Detection range1,180 m400 m
Field of view10.5°17.5°
DisplayLCOS 1280x960LCOS 1280x960
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7.5 hup to 8 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionremovable 18650 Li-ion
Weight313 g360 g
Water resistanceIP67—

Sources: AGM Taipan TM25-384 (spec page); Guide TD210 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Taipan TM25-384 · Guide TD210 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More