Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Taipan TM25-384 vs Burris BTH 35 v2

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

AGM's first-generation 384×288 pocket thermal with a 25 mm lens, 50 Hz, 7.5-hour battery and IP67 body; discontinued in favour of the Taipan V2.
no live Amazon listing tracked
Burris's 400×300 handheld thermal with a 35 mm F1.0 lens, 1280×960 display, Wi-Fi app control and a tripod thread; a US product sold in small numbers in the UK.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Taipan TM25-384Burris BTH 35 v2
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288400×300
Pixel pitch12 µm12 µm
NETD≤35 mK—
Lens25 mm35 mm
Magnification2.5–20x—
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range1,180 m—
Field of view10.5°7.8°
DisplayLCOS 1280x960LCOS 1280x960
Recordingphoto and video—
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7.5 hup to 5 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ion—
Weight313 g624 g
Water resistanceIP67—

Sources: AGM Taipan TM25-384 (spec page); Burris BTH 35 v2 (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Taipan TM25-384 · Burris BTH 35 v2 · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More