Home › Models › Thermal monoculars › Compare

AGM Taipan TM25-384 vs ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x

Two thermal monoculars compared on the makers' own figures. Rows in bold are where they differ; a dash means that maker does not publish the figure.

AGM's first-generation 384×288 pocket thermal with a 25 mm lens, 50 Hz, 7.5-hour battery and IP67 body; discontinued in favour of the Taipan V2.
no live Amazon listing tracked
ATN's wide-angle 384×288 monocular: 1.25–5x, 16° field of view, 60 Hz, HD recording and an 18-hour internal battery.
no live Amazon listing tracked

Specification side by side

AGM Taipan TM25-384ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x
TechnologyThermalThermal
Sensor384×288384×288
Pixel pitch12 µm—
NETD≤35 mK—
Lens25 mm—
Magnification2.5–20x1.3–5x
Digital zoomup to 8xup to 4x
Detection range1,180 m686 m
Field of view10.5°16°
DisplayLCOS 1280x9601280x720
Recordingphoto and videophoto and video
Wi-Fi / appyesyes
Battery lifeup to 7.5 hup to 18 h
Batterybuilt-in Li-ionbuilt-in Li-ion
Weight313 g850 g
Water resistanceIP67—

Sources: AGM Taipan TM25-384 (spec page); ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x (spec page). Detection ranges are for a 1.8 m object under each maker's own test conditions and are not directly comparable between brands.

Full pages: AGM Taipan TM25-384 · ATN OTS 4T 384 1.25-5x · all thermal monoculars in stock today

Specifications are the manufacturers' published figures. Prices are Amazon.co.uk at our last daily check. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. More